I spoke to another MV Collector recently and he said the CCKW 352 (primarily used as an artillery tractor as we all know) has a different gear box compared to the CCKW 353 resulting in a slower max speed. Is that true?
I drove my friends 352 two weeks ago. Gear shifting and driving was all the same compared to my 353. I felt no difference. But my experience was, his SWB truck was very powerfull. He had to tow my Jimmy home a few kilometers after an event (I had fuel problems, as already posted in this forum). Even a steep grade was no problem for him. Thank god my GMC is equipped with a winch
Regards,
Chris
Question: 352 slower than 353?
- Chris_M
- Captain
- Posts: 203
- Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 10:55 am
- Location: Near Nuremberg, Germany
- Contact:
Question: 352 slower than 353?
45 CCKW 353 2
-
- Lieutenant Colonel
- Posts: 981
- Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 1:10 am
- Location: Kennebunkport, Maine
There is a "high traction" gear set 6.4 ratio listed in the parts manuals
as well as the std 6.1 ratio.
I was not aware that the 352 had one type while the 353 had another type
Could this be what your friend was refering to?
John
as well as the std 6.1 ratio.
I was not aware that the 352 had one type while the 353 had another type
Could this be what your friend was refering to?
John
42 Chevy G7117
44 Ford M20 armored car
44 CCKW 353 A1 660 gal Tanker
45 CCKW 353 B2 Air-portable
Ben Hur 1 ton trailer
MVPA#26900
44 Ford M20 armored car
44 CCKW 353 A1 660 gal Tanker
45 CCKW 353 B2 Air-portable
Ben Hur 1 ton trailer
MVPA#26900
- Chris_M
- Captain
- Posts: 203
- Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 10:55 am
- Location: Near Nuremberg, Germany
- Contact:
-
- Lieutenant Colonel
- Posts: 981
- Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 1:10 am
- Location: Kennebunkport, Maine
I can't answer it either.
All my examples have the 6.1 ratio.
I mis-read the parts manual gear ratio ,PN 608434 as they are also 6.1 ratio and not 6.4 ratio
According to an old sage the high traction gear sets where replaced with the std set during various "rebuilds" due to failure rates in the "timkin" axled trucks
their service life in Banjo axled trucks did not have the same failure rate.
Hope this helps
John
All my examples have the 6.1 ratio.
I mis-read the parts manual gear ratio ,PN 608434 as they are also 6.1 ratio and not 6.4 ratio
According to an old sage the high traction gear sets where replaced with the std set during various "rebuilds" due to failure rates in the "timkin" axled trucks
their service life in Banjo axled trucks did not have the same failure rate.
Hope this helps
John
42 Chevy G7117
44 Ford M20 armored car
44 CCKW 353 A1 660 gal Tanker
45 CCKW 353 B2 Air-portable
Ben Hur 1 ton trailer
MVPA#26900
44 Ford M20 armored car
44 CCKW 353 A1 660 gal Tanker
45 CCKW 353 B2 Air-portable
Ben Hur 1 ton trailer
MVPA#26900
-
- Brigadier General
- Posts: 2400
- Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 1:10 am
- Location: Pembroke NH
- Contact:
The std ratio for the CCKW is 6.67 X 1.
For the M211/M135 it is 6.16 X 1
The High Traction was a poor attempt at posi-traction. IHC had a much better system.
For the M211/M135 it is 6.16 X 1
The High Traction was a poor attempt at posi-traction. IHC had a much better system.
Dr Deuce Over 50,000 driven miles in a CCKW
1942 CCKW closed cab shopvan
1943 CCKW closed cab cargo w/M32 MG mount
1944 CCKW open cab LeRoi Kompressor
1944 CCKW open cab F1 Aircraft fueler tanker
1945 CCKW open cab cargo w/artic cab
1942 Chev cargo
1942 Chev K51 Panel
1944 Chev M6 Bomb Truck
1942 GPW Jeep
http://home.comcast.net/~cckw/wsb/html/ ... 59870.html
1942 CCKW closed cab shopvan
1943 CCKW closed cab cargo w/M32 MG mount
1944 CCKW open cab LeRoi Kompressor
1944 CCKW open cab F1 Aircraft fueler tanker
1945 CCKW open cab cargo w/artic cab
1942 Chev cargo
1942 Chev K51 Panel
1944 Chev M6 Bomb Truck
1942 GPW Jeep
http://home.comcast.net/~cckw/wsb/html/ ... 59870.html