900x20 Tires

Facts, Tips, Hints, and other snippets about the CCKW, Chevy, or DUKW
Post Reply
Miner Matt
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
Posts: 81
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Mariposa CA

900x20 Tires

Post by Miner Matt »

I was woundering can I mount 900x20s on 750x20 rims.Were do you find other rims for these trucks? Are there other sizes and configurations of rims avliable and what are there off of ?

Thanks,Matt
awg
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
Posts: 118
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2006 12:33 am
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia

9.00 tyres

Post by awg »

there is a post thread about them i read, it started with a pic of
a listers truck, looked good, but Joel pointed out had 9.00 tyres,
you might seach for that thread, the owner saying he got a good deal etc.

Dr Deuce said somewhere that whilst higher maximum speed can be acheived, a corresponding loss of torque will be felt badly going uphill.

I think that 7.50 tyres would be strongly recomended by most listers.

Having said that I am curious about what is the max practical tyre size
CCKW 353 w/winch
armydriver
Brigadier General
Brigadier General
Posts: 2595
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 1:10 am
Location: San Antonio, Texas

Post by armydriver »

The rims are the same but I believe that most would prefer the 7:50 suze as that is what the trucks were designed for. Still there are posters on this site that have the 9:00 tires due to their being readily available at a reasonable costs from a surplus dealer.
52 M38 Willy's
Former owner and restorer of CCKW353 " Betty Boop"

proud father of a career Army officer/Blackhawk pilot/ War in Iraq veteran
Retired high school history teacher at Lt. Colonel Robert G. Cole CMH High School, Fort Sam Houston Texas
proud great grandson of four Confederate soldiers.
great great grandson of a War of 1812 veteran
great great great grandson of 2 American Revolutionary war veterans
User avatar
Cat Man
Major
Major
Posts: 420
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 9:55 pm
Location: Green Bay WI

Post by Cat Man »

I think you will find that there is not enough offset or dish in the 7.50X20 rims. The wider 9.00 tire will not have any space between the tires side walls on the rear dual mounts and will interfere with each other.

As I recall, those who have converted CCKW and Chev's have to use 9.00X20 rims from a later M series truck in order to allow for the wider profile on the rears.

Can't remember if there is a difference between M-211 and M-35 Rim's? Don't think so but not sure.

Cat Man
40 Years An Engine Guy
30 Years A Caterpillar Guy
Still Learning Every Day
dr deuce
Brigadier General
Brigadier General
Posts: 2400
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 1:10 am
Location: Pembroke NH
Contact:

Post by dr deuce »

I believe CAT man is correct. My Annie the crane has wheels and tires off of a 1956 GMC civy-mil tanker truck. The M35/M211 wheels would be a good bet too.

I believe that you would have a hard time assembling the 9x20's on the 7.50x20 wheels and that they would almost impossible to get apart due to having to the the tire away from the ring.
Dr Deuce Over 50,000 driven miles in a CCKW
1942 CCKW closed cab shopvan
1943 CCKW closed cab cargo w/M32 MG mount
1944 CCKW open cab LeRoi Kompressor
1944 CCKW open cab F1 Aircraft fueler tanker
1945 CCKW open cab cargo w/artic cab
1942 Chev cargo
1942 Chev K51 Panel
1944 Chev M6 Bomb Truck
1942 GPW Jeep
http://home.comcast.net/~cckw/wsb/html/ ... 59870.html
John V Cliche
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 981
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 1:10 am
Location: Kennebunkport, Maine

Post by John V Cliche »

Hi Matt
I don't want to contradict any one but , I bought a 1 1/2 ton chevy with a good set of 900X 20 tires mounted on 750x20 rims clearance between the duals was not a problem ,and fender clearance was not an issue , but the truck was never fully loaded either.
The previous owner stated that he mounted the 900s on because he had them and 750 tires for this truck were shot and he would not by new ones.
The owner stated that he had a truck tire dealer do the mounting for him,
I don't how difficult it was to mount the 900s on the rims but they sure broke -down and came off real easy, :)
I bought and installed the correct tires 750x20
I still have have the 900s they are free to anyone interested.
Hope this helps
John
42 Chevy G7117
44 Ford M20 armored car
44 CCKW 353 A1 660 gal Tanker
45 CCKW 353 B2 Air-portable
Ben Hur 1 ton trailer
MVPA#26900
Miner Matt
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
Posts: 81
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Mariposa CA

Post by Miner Matt »

Thanks for all the info.

Chris in Chowcilla set me up with a good used set of tries.

So my problems are over for now.

I see pictures of these trucks with duals on the front. That has to be hard on the running gear and the brakes!

Thanks again Chris !!!!

Hope everyone has a happy new year.

SEE YOU NEXT YEAR,Matt
Last edited by Miner Matt on Tue Jan 02, 2007 11:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
KEVINABR
Major
Major
Posts: 412
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: RAMSGATE ENGLAND

Post by KEVINABR »

hi miner matt,
putting duals on the front looks mad :x :x and i know someone who did it and told me the steering was very hard, he tried it on a hard surface so that might be why,as it was intended for soft ground!!!!!!!!!!! glad you got your tyre s sorted
1941 GMC 352 A1 Cargo 29595
1942 GMC 353 F2 Workshop 102620 ST6 Type M18 Electrical Repair
1942 GMC 353 B2 Cargo
1942 Ben Hur 1ton Wooden Cargo Trailer
1942 Chevrolet G506 G7113 Tractor 1NK 245837
1944 5ton The Trailer Company of America, Stake and Platform Semi Trailer
1943 Dodge WC63 6x6 82035401
194? Diamond T 968a 968A7471
PFC 514th Q.M T.C We Deliver Everything, Except Babies
Capt Lee P
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
Posts: 93
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 1:10 am
Location: N. Calif

900 tires

Post by Capt Lee P »

I had 7.50 tires on my truck and with internal engine modifications was able to increase its horsepower and torque. Once that was accomplished, I put 8.25's on the truck (scout /half-track tires). It gives me about 5 mph more and I feel a better look.

P.S. The tires fit fine on the 7.50's CCKW rims with no problems.
Capt Lee, Vietnam Vet, US Army, 1942 GPW, 1944 WC-51, 1943 Batnam T-3, 1943 Ben Hur (wood), 1944 CCKW B2 353
dr deuce
Brigadier General
Brigadier General
Posts: 2400
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 1:10 am
Location: Pembroke NH
Contact:

Post by dr deuce »

Virually everyone agrees that WW2 trucks had tires 1 or 2 sizes too small. I have never figured out why the Dodge 3/4 tonners had "appropiate tires' when all the rest, especially the CCKW and Chev did not.
Dr Deuce Over 50,000 driven miles in a CCKW
1942 CCKW closed cab shopvan
1943 CCKW closed cab cargo w/M32 MG mount
1944 CCKW open cab LeRoi Kompressor
1944 CCKW open cab F1 Aircraft fueler tanker
1945 CCKW open cab cargo w/artic cab
1942 Chev cargo
1942 Chev K51 Panel
1944 Chev M6 Bomb Truck
1942 GPW Jeep
http://home.comcast.net/~cckw/wsb/html/ ... 59870.html
armydriver
Brigadier General
Brigadier General
Posts: 2595
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 1:10 am
Location: San Antonio, Texas

Post by armydriver »

Agreed with all of the above. The 8:25 always looked like a good alternate to me, Still these trucks were 1930's technology and the tires at that time were natural rubber and cotton fabric so perhaps the tire technology of the time was not advanced enough to build larger tires for that much weight that would hold up uder the conditions they built the trucks for. If I remember the forerunner to the CCK series, the early GMC's had 7:00x20 tires on them.
52 M38 Willy's
Former owner and restorer of CCKW353 " Betty Boop"

proud father of a career Army officer/Blackhawk pilot/ War in Iraq veteran
Retired high school history teacher at Lt. Colonel Robert G. Cole CMH High School, Fort Sam Houston Texas
proud great grandson of four Confederate soldiers.
great great grandson of a War of 1812 veteran
great great great grandson of 2 American Revolutionary war veterans
rwdfresno
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
Posts: 68
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 6:35 pm
Contact:

Post by rwdfresno »

I think that more than anything it had a lot to do with the designers at the time. There was a lot of maturing in the large truck designs and manufacturing between the 1930's and 1945. You look at a the post war large trucks on the civilian market and they are far more developed than pre-war trucks. Just for instance take a look at all of the wood that was used in pre-war trucks for spacers, stiffeners, shims etc. I think up until WWII many companies were still in the horseless carriage mindset. Once the war got fired up the rubber supply was strained which probably didn't help matters. WWII was the first highly mechanized war and I don't think that the designers fully realized how the vehicles would perform in mud, soft terrain etc over the long term.
Ryan
Miner Matt
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
Posts: 81
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Mariposa CA

Post by Miner Matt »

Ryan that is a very good point. :lol: :lol: :lol:
42 CCKW
1941 U.S.M.C International TD-6
Conn
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
Posts: 91
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 8:44 am
Location: Jeffersonville, Ohio
Contact:

!

Post by Conn »

We went and measured some origianl rims from our CCKW, and they're about 5 1/2 inches wide inside of the rim. That would be awfully narrow to mount a 900/20 on. Our truck now has 8.25/20's and they're on 7 inch wide rims. Mounting too wide of a tire on a narrow rim makes the height of the tire taller, but gives you less width than what the tire's designed for (besides being a pain to put on), but I understand your pain, a new set of 7.5/20's at $150-$170 a piece = WOW :shock:
1940 Packard 110 Touring Sedan
1945 M3A4 Hand Utility Cart
1945 GMC CCKW 353 H1
http://americanbombardier.tripod.com/cckwproject/
Post Reply